The Trust Machine
When does it pay to cooperate?
Cooperate or defect, meet your opponent again, and discover what a little forgiveness changes.
Open experimentTed’s Public Workbench Interactive Experiments
Your best move depends on someone else.
What happens next?
Make a choice. See what it sets in motion. Then change the rules and try again. Twenty small experiments explore why we cooperate, what we believe about other people, and how the rules change the result.
What do you expect?
Make a move that matters.
Follow the incentives.
Adjust one assumption.
Try the idea elsewhere.
The Collection
Six experiments introduce choices, cooperation, and the ways sensible decisions can collide.
When does it pay to cooperate?
Cooperate or defect, meet your opponent again, and discover what a little forgiveness changes.
Open experiment
Can everyone be unhappy and still stay put?
Play both sides of a two-person game. Change the payoffs and find out who has a reason to move.
Open experiment
What would make your team take the first step?
Help eight teams choose a shared technology. Test expectations, pilot support, and commitments.
Open experiment
Is your next move easier to guess than you think?
Face a pattern-seeking opponent, then build a random strategy and compare it with an even mix.
Open experiment
Will a threat survive the moment of decision?
Enter a market, make a threat, and work backward through the choices. See what a deposit changes.
Open experiment
Could an extra road make your commute worse?
Open a shortcut, let drivers choose their routes, and compare the result with a coordinated plan.
Open experimentEight experiments explore shared resources, bargaining, hidden information, and changing beliefs.
Why help pay when everyone gets the benefit?
Choose a contribution, add matching funds, and compare your points with the group’s total.
Open experiment
How much can you take without emptying the lake?
Fish from a shared lake, change its growth and harvesting rules, and follow the stock through time.
Open experiment
What makes an offer worth accepting?
Divide a shared reward, compare alternatives, and see how waiting or rejecting changes the result.
Open experiment
What does winning actually cost you?
Compare first-price and second-price bids, then test what happens when bidders estimate a shared value.
Open experiment
Can a promise tell you what is hidden?
Try claims and costly signals, update a buyer’s expectations, and check who would want to imitate whom.
Open experiment
How many steps ahead should you think?
Choose a number against different reasoning styles and watch the group’s target change over rounds.
Open experiment
Is a private message as useful as a public announcement?
Send messages and acknowledgments, compare possible delivery histories, and test what each side can know.
Open experiment
Does a successful strategy stay successful as it spreads?
Mix Hawk and Dove strategies, change conflict costs, and introduce a small invading group.
Open experimentSix experiments ask how advice, matching, voting, credit, and rewards change what people do.
When is following shared advice your best move?
Compare independent choices with coordinated recommendations, then inspect the incentive to obey or switch.
Open experiment
Can every pair be satisfied with the match?
Rank possible partners, step through proposals, switch who proposes, and look for pairs that want to leave.
Open experiment
How much did each teammate add to the result?
Set the value of different teams, compare ways to split credit, and check whether a subgroup could do better.
Open experiment
Can the same preferences produce different winners?
Compare four voting rules, separate honest preferences from submitted ballots, and inspect ties and cycles.
Open experiment
Will the reward improve the work or just the score?
Choose a reward rule, inspect effort and shortcuts, and compare employee pay with the value created.
Open experiment
Will your rules encourage people to tell the truth?
Allocate one scarce item by queue, lottery, priority, or auction, then compare truthful and exaggerated reports.
Open experimentOne More Road. A Longer Commute.
The Traffic Paradox puts individual choices on a shared road network. Add a shortcut, inspect the route flows, and see why the fastest route for one driver can make everyone slower.
Open the Traffic Paradox →Before the shortcut
After drivers settle
A theoretical result for 4,000 drivers under this experiment’s default road costs. Change the assumptions and test it.
Game theory studies choices whose outcomes depend on other people’s choices. Here, you can inspect the points each player earns, replay the same random sequence, and ask which assumptions fit your own situation.
Every experiment includes step-by-step math using pre-algebra, a separate expert section with formal equations, and a scenario link. The numbers describe the model. The questions are yours to take into a team, a negotiation, or a shared project.
The learning-by-playing approach is inspired by Nicky Case’s The Evolution of Trust. These experiments use their own models and implementation.
Start with the first six experiments if game theory is new to you. Then follow a question that interests you: sharing a lake, negotiating a split, choosing a voting rule, or rewarding good work.
Each experiment stands on its own. The final Mechanism Design Studio brings the ideas together: choose an allocation rule, then test what it encourages people to report.
These are small teaching models. Their assumptions and tie-breaking rules are part of the explanation, so you can see what a result does and does not establish.